Devastated by years of fighting, Syria’s battle-weary armed forces are struggling to make significant gains despite intense Russian air support for a series of new offensives. In fact, Russian air strikes have been ineffective so far in terms of real gains on the ground.
Nearly three weeks of air strikes have given the psychopath Baschar al-Assad’s regime and his forces a morale boost, analysts say, but so far the effect on the ground has been negligible.
A longtime ally of Damascus, Russia escalated its support in late September with an air campaign aimed at bolstering regime positions and backing ground operations by Syrian government troops. It has so far carried out more than 500 air strikes.
Joined by fighters from Lebanon’s Hizbullah and Iran’s elite Quds force, Syria’s army has in the last two weeks launched ground assaults in Aleppo in the north, Hama and Homs in the center, Latakia along the coast and outside Damascus.
The army has made small gains, seizing some villages in Aleppo, Homs and Hama.
But it has yet to regain control over any key sites or supply routes and a major advance launched in Aleppo on Saturday — and boosted by a reported 2,000 Iranian and Iran-backed fighters — seems to have stalled. Russian air strikes have been ineffective so far.
Yezid Sayigh at the Carnegie Middle East Center said:
“The air support from Russia by itself is not enough to tip the balance in the favor of the regime, especially since there are so many gaps and weak spots in the Syrian army’s ground forces,”
The Syrian army’s 300,000-strong pre-war force has been roughly halved by deaths, defections and widespread draft-dodging.
According to a recent toll, more than 52,000 regime soldiers have been killed since Syria’s conflict began in 2011.
The regime is also running short of sophisticated weaponry, experts said.
“The Syrian air force had used up nearly all of its ammunition and missiles provided by Russia and was left only with locally-made barrel bombs,” a regional military expert previously based in Syria said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
For the moment, Russia’s intervention has certainly “restored the morale” of Syria’s army, but not done much else, Sayigh said. In other words, Russian air strikes have been ineffective so far.
Since it began strikes on September 30, Moscow has said it is targeting the Islamic State jihadist group and other “terrorists,” while rebels and their international backers accuse Russia of striking non-IS groups in a bid to prop up the psychopath Assad.
Although Russia’s involvement was received with much fanfare, “changes on the ground are rather minimal,” said Karim Bitar of the Paris-based Institute for International and Strategic Relations.
“Militarily, the Russians are mostly trying to preserve the status quo and to make sure territories currently controlled by the Syrian regime remain under Assad’s firm hand,” Bitar said.
After more than four years of fighting that has left more than 300,000 dead, Assad’s regime is in control of about 30 percent of Syrian territory.
“At this stage, the Russians are not willing to reconquer territory that has already been lost” by stepping up the intervention with ground troops or even more intense strikes, Bitar said.
One of the priority areas is Latakia province, the coastal heartland of Assad’s regime and his Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam.
Latakia has come under attack from a powerful coalition of opposition forces, including Al-Qaida affiliate Al-Nusra Front, seeking to advance from the strategic Sahl al-Ghab plain at the intersection of Hama, Latakia and Idlib provinces.
For Damascus, keeping Latakia safe means securing Sahl al-Ghab and the nearby supply routes that link the coast to the capital, Sayigh told AFP.
The fighting for the plain and surrounding provinces has been intense, especially as the rebels are entrenched and well-armed — in some cases with U.S.-made TOW missiles provided by Washington to moderate fighters. Put differently, Russian air strikes have been ineffective so far.
Chris Kozak of the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War wrote in an analysis of recent fighting:
“Regime forces suffered heavy losses in manpower and materiel in the face of heavy rebel resistance… The Syrian regime has not gained much terrain in the first week of its large-scale ground offensive against rebel forces, despite support from intensified Russian airstrikes and hundreds of Iranian proxy reinforcements.”
The offensives could even backfire, he said, noting that “heavy casualties may leave pro-regime forces vulnerable to a counter-attack by Syrian rebels.”
AFP contributed to this article.