John Dillinger had many accomplices. Imagine then for a moment that the Kremlin issues a directive against any of his accomplices prohibiting them from dealing with Russian banks or traveling to Russia.

In a crude way, this is exactly the effect of the Magnitsky Bill on Putin’s behavior. It is supposed to be more of an announcement than a punishment, more of a signal than real legislation to help Russian dissidents defeat another dictator. Putin’s low-level response of halting all adoption of Russian children by American parents was in fact an appropriate response to a Bill that was spun for its importance, but which genuinely looks more like DoS is brushing a hibernating bear.  In fact, the Magnitsky Bill repealed the Cold War-era Jackson-Vanik restrictions on trade with Russia to establish normal bilateral trade between Russia and the US.

Maybe someone can explain to me why repeal of trade sanctions and normalization of bilateral trade are sold to the public as a punishment.

I am not an expert on Russian international relations, but I am knowledgeable about the standard practices of the US State Department. Often, DoS does not see eye-to-eye with US Congress on foreign policy and when it wants to please Congress or push for its own message, the magnitude of the damage of any Bill sponsored by Foggy Bottom becomes more of a ridicule than serious intent. The Magnitsky Act, in my humble opinion, falls more within the category of “Hey, Putin, we are here”.

John Kerry watched over the passing of this Bill as the Foreign Relations Committee Chairman in the Senate. That is enough distinction to drown the most optimistic of critics and anything Kerry pursues explains the “Double Negative” notion in the English language like no other explanation can. Just like normalizing trade with Russia and selling it as a punishment just because it has a human rights component DoS will ignore anyway.

Russia, China, and the United States are refusing to sign a letter, already signed by 52 countries that would refer Assad to the International Criminal Court at The Hague. Syria is not a member of the ICC, which gives Assad the excuse to ignore it, but if there are enough countries, the pressure will mount on the rest to force the issue against the will of a known terrorist.

Obama cannot find the time or the excuse to question himself or to tell us why the US has not signed this letter. No member of the mainstream media or any other media will drill him on this issue. Funny how the left is all heart when it comes to the perception by the public, but is all steel decision time. That is their genius. They can fool anyone, anytime, on anything and Obama showed them how to use words to pave the way.

John Kerry, the new Secretary of State is probably pressing for that decision. If matters were bad with Obama by himself in power, now they are ten times worse with the three amigos: Obama, Kerry, and soon Hagel.

The Magnitsky Bill will not stop Putin. His government said it yesterday by telling the UN Security Council not to bother taking that route on Syria by seeking to refer Assad to the war crimes tribunal. Why should Russia not be so explicit when they have Obama by their side as a genocide watcher too?

Syria is proof that the 21st Century looks like a repeat of its predecessor. More wars, more killings, more genocides, and most important of all, more violent men to start violence and five times as many unwilling to stop them.

.. Moreover, some anthropologists believe man left the caves.

Please, tell Barack Obama to sign the letter by signing this RPS petition

Share our content. It's unique and it's FREE.

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 + twelve =

Previous post

RPS Petition for Obama to Sign Letter Refering Assad to War Crimes Tribunal

Next post

Syrian War between Its Starters, Its Watchers, Its Wrappers, and Its Inciters